BENJAMIN BLADY

__________________________________________

 


Benjamin Blady - Los Angeles Employment Lawyers - Class Actions, Employee Discrimination, Disability, Sexual Harassment, Wrongful and Unlawful Termination - Discharge - Firing, Overtime, Family and Medical Leave, FMLA, CFRA, FEHA, Labor Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Offices, Law Firms
6310 San Vicente Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90048
United States

ph: 323-933-1352
fax: 323-933-1353

Case Law

Benjamin Blady provides selected recent published cases which address issues in California labor and employment law.  The cases have headings which summarize key issues in the opinions.  The cases selected for inclusion start from June 2009.

  • Chau v. Starbucks Corporation
    (June 2, 2009 - 4th District of California)

    This opinion examines the California tip-pooling law as applied to Starbuck's policy to allow certain service employees, known as shift supervisors, to share in tips that customers place in a collective tip box.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Johnson v. Arvin-Edison Water Storage District
    (June 3, 2009 - 5th District of California)

    This opinion examines the California public entity exemption from certain California wage and hour laws.

    Click Here to Read The Opinion

  • Haro v. City of Rosemead
    (June 9, 2009 - 2nd District of California)

    This opinion examines whether a complaint grounded only on an FLSA statutory claim may be maintained as a class action.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Gross v. FBL Financial Services
    (June 18, 2009 - United States Supreme Court)

    This opinion examines whether a mixed-motive instruction is proper in an Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) case.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Arias v. Superior Court (Angelo Dairy)
    (June 29, 2009 - California Supreme Court)

    This opinion examines whether an employee needs to meet class action requirement when bringing a claim under Business & Professions Code section 17200, et. seq, and Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Labor Code section 2698, et seq.)

    Click Here to Read Opinion

  • Amalgamated Transit Union, Local v. Superior Court (First Transit)
    (June 29, 2009 - California Supreme Court)

    This opinion examines whether a labor union may bring a representative action under under Business & Professions Code section 17200, et. seq, and Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Labor Code section 2698, et seq.)

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Ricci v. DeStefano
    (June 29, 2009 - United States Supreme Court)

    This opinion examines issues related to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, Race Discrimination and Disparate Impact.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Scott v. Phoenix Schools
    (July 1, 2009 - 3rd District of California)

    This opinion examines a jury verdict for plaintiff for wrongful termination in violation of public policy and for puntive damages.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Martorana v. Marlin & Saltzman
    (July 1, 2009 - 2nd District California)

    This opinion examines issues relating to the notice of settlement in  a class action wage and hour lawsuit and Plaintiff's attempt to plead claims arising out of his failure to timely file a claim.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Hughes v. Pair
    (July 2, 2009 - Supreme Court of California)

    This opinion examines a claim for sexual harassment in a business relationships outside of the workplace pursuant to Civil Code section 51.9.  The case examines both a hostile environment and quid pro quo theory.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Clark v. American Residential Services
    (July 6, 2009 - 2nd District California)

    This opinion examines the objections of objectors to a class action settlement for alleged unpaid minimum and overtime wages, failure to provide meal and rest periods, other Labor Code violations and unfair business practices, including whether the court had sufficient information to have an understanding of the amount in controversy and the realistic range of outcomes.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Vinole v. Countrywide Home Loans
    (July 7, 2009 - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals)

    This opinion examines the propriety of the denial of class certification based on the claimed misclassification by Countrywide of its external home loan consultants.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • In re Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
    (July 7, 2009 - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals)

    This opinion examines the propriety of the grant of class certification based on the claimed misclassification by Wells Fargo of its home mortgage consultants.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

  • Boucher v. Shaw
    (July 27, 2009 - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals)

    The opinion examines whether managers could be held liable under the Fair Labor Standards Act as employers.

    Click Here to Read the Opinion

Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.

Isaiah Benjamin Joel Blady

 

[netinsert=840.5001.1.8.1]

 

 

Benjamin Blady - Los Angeles Employment Lawyers - Class Actions, Employee Discrimination, Disability, Sexual Harassment, Wrongful and Unlawful Termination - Discharge - Firing, Overtime, Family and Medical Leave, FMLA, CFRA, FEHA, Labor Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Offices, Law Firms
6310 San Vicente Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90048
United States

ph: 323-933-1352
fax: 323-933-1353